Barry is charged with "Dishonestly accessing a computer". Well, he was authorised actually to access these computers. Unauthorised disclosure of data can be more fitting. However, since taxpayer owns that data (disclosed to them) and data was sanitised, this charge has no standing. He can be fired form his job due to lack of authorisatio…
Barry is charged with "Dishonestly accessing a computer". Well, he was authorised actually to access these computers. Unauthorised disclosure of data can be more fitting. However, since taxpayer owns that data (disclosed to them) and data was sanitised, this charge has no standing. He can be fired form his job due to lack of authorisation or misbehaviour, but I don't see that as some sort of malicious/criminal 'hacking' or this sort of things. This charge will be dismissed I think.
Barry is charged with "Dishonestly accessing a computer". Well, he was authorised actually to access these computers. Unauthorised disclosure of data can be more fitting. However, since taxpayer owns that data (disclosed to them) and data was sanitised, this charge has no standing. He can be fired form his job due to lack of authorisation or misbehaviour, but I don't see that as some sort of malicious/criminal 'hacking' or this sort of things. This charge will be dismissed I think.