My data extraction and summary was spot on. But ChatGPT improperly analyzed it. Here are the issues I encountered to save you some headaches if you want to use it to analyze data.
One major reason they create create doom scenarios around AI and want to enforce tight regulation is because they want to be able to control it's replies to queries into issues that the deep state has some interest in. There are other concerns legitimate as well but they take a back seat in the eyes of the deep state in my opinion.
Steve, I will offer the foundational principal of generative AI for your continuing thinking: Generative AI is only useful IF YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER before you ask the question. Because networked transactions are not traceable nor back-traceable, the probabilistic nature of the process assures that wrong answers are, and will forever be, presented. You are smart enough to pick up some of the errors and get the engine to try again, but that is just a fluke of your smartness. You (and everyone else) will eventually ask a question to which you do not already know the answer, will act on what you are told, and bad things will transpire. (This is why the rapid retreat from AI doctors and the recent Paxton Texas fraud settlement against an AI engine that was proposing to make medical records easier to process -- except, as with all AI, they were randomly wrong.)
So if the tool makes things easier for you to do stuff and you already know what the answer should be, then like any other tool -- great. But you risk a lot giving it more credibility than that.
It would really be good to have a single age adjusted figure for how much the vaxxes hurt overall mortality. Take the few batches with lowest overall mortality for a base line and then see how much higher the mortality is for the vaxxes as a whole. And see how you can make it consistent with the medicare data.
I’m getting fatigued with the number of content creators publishing their validations through AI. It is far more interesting to review the opinions of bright human beings.
My Fortune 100 engineering employer provides us an AI chatbot server. I never consult it on any problem I haven’t already worked on and mostly solved. It makes more rookie errors with factual data than a $16/hr job shopper.
Well done Steve using ChatGPT as a calculator to prove your math! AI will never have the ability of a human. But humans can use it to double check their work.
OK, I was able to complete the analysis with ChatGPT just now. Going to bed. You'll see the full transcript tomorrow and YOU ARE GOING TO LOVE IT.
May God give us the power to stop them. It is clear that many are doing this knowingly
One major reason they create create doom scenarios around AI and want to enforce tight regulation is because they want to be able to control it's replies to queries into issues that the deep state has some interest in. There are other concerns legitimate as well but they take a back seat in the eyes of the deep state in my opinion.
Thank goodness you’re a misinformation superspreader. I think that means you’re free.
ChatGPT is good to write texts using word probabilities, but it will fumble with numbers, especially in tables and if there is a lot.
not if you guide it.
what if you'd used Copilot instead? Same results?
you can try using the same methods. It's very unlikely to be different.
Steve, I will offer the foundational principal of generative AI for your continuing thinking: Generative AI is only useful IF YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER before you ask the question. Because networked transactions are not traceable nor back-traceable, the probabilistic nature of the process assures that wrong answers are, and will forever be, presented. You are smart enough to pick up some of the errors and get the engine to try again, but that is just a fluke of your smartness. You (and everyone else) will eventually ask a question to which you do not already know the answer, will act on what you are told, and bad things will transpire. (This is why the rapid retreat from AI doctors and the recent Paxton Texas fraud settlement against an AI engine that was proposing to make medical records easier to process -- except, as with all AI, they were randomly wrong.)
So if the tool makes things easier for you to do stuff and you already know what the answer should be, then like any other tool -- great. But you risk a lot giving it more credibility than that.
the analysis is straightforward.
It would really be good to have a single age adjusted figure for how much the vaxxes hurt overall mortality. Take the few batches with lowest overall mortality for a base line and then see how much higher the mortality is for the vaxxes as a whole. And see how you can make it consistent with the medicare data.
that's exactly what you get here. One number for each vaccine.
Steve, you are a legend.
Legend Disease - Foil, Arms and Hog
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcdcRaws7rg
In my view, the only reason to use AI at this point is to make fun of it.
bad plan. AI is awesome. It's repeatable and honest. It makes mistakes which is why you watch over it, but it executes with precision.
I’m getting fatigued with the number of content creators publishing their validations through AI. It is far more interesting to review the opinions of bright human beings.
Bright human beings completely differ on the Czech data. that's why an unbiased source is so valuable.
My Fortune 100 engineering employer provides us an AI chatbot server. I never consult it on any problem I haven’t already worked on and mostly solved. It makes more rookie errors with factual data than a $16/hr job shopper.
it's all in how you use it.
Anybody know the latest update on Steve’s vision? I may have missed it.
slowly getting better. I posted my vision test python program to my github. I'm still failing it.
Well done Steve using ChatGPT as a calculator to prove your math! AI will never have the ability of a human. But humans can use it to double check their work.
EXACTLY RIGHT!
Three cheers for the misinformation spreader. Hip Hip Horah 😁
as an aside are you aware that tedros and his fellow cronies at the who plan to have the pandemic treaty done and dusted by the end of the year
of course. safe and effective!