Why is Pfizer silent on this study showing their COVID vaccines are killing people? Why isn't the mainstream media asking them to comment on this study?
The crazy thing is, an hour later, someone else could interact with Grok and ask it all of these same questions all over again, and it will revert to playing dumb all over again. AI is programmed by the folks that made it, and sadly, very little to no AI I know of on the market currently is trained to be smart, or even honest, about some of these very important issues.
People won't change their opinions of many challenges with truth because of their evil pride and insecurity issues. Politics and their person of choice is a major one. Narcissists aren't about truth, but winning at any cost. Fact is, they have already lost and are too corrupt to admit it.
We all know that the Covid jabs are a depopulation plan with huge sums of profit or big Pharma and many others. No one will admit anything. People need to wake up and STOP LISTENING TO THE LIES.
ALL mRNA shots are uncontrollable, unpredictable, and unproven for long-term safety and efficacy.
'In-house safety and efficacy tests/trials' are predetermined to be successful because it's more profitable to avoid reality. Big Pharma is checking its own 'homework'? Profit before safety = catastrophic health issues, but, more importantly, massive profits for Big Pharma!
mRNA vax is, however, guaranteed to cause Adverse Reactions (often serious and incurable), sudden DEATH or, at best, dramatically reduced Life Expectancy
LIABILITY must be immediately reintroduced for all medicines, particularly injections called 'vaccines'. NO LIABILITY is Big Pharma's Licence to Kill with impunity.
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll live longer by avoiding mRNA from unscrupulous doctors and nurses.
Liability For All Injectables & all meds! Period! Reagan’s 1986 Act was diabolical & he was a coward for not standing up to big pHARMa on our behalf! Millions have died ever since. He fundamentally changed the trajectory of the vaccine industry against the people. This is when they officially turned it into a bio weapons program. mRNA LNP technology needs to be banned & removed from the market, worldwide! Now!
But BC government published a report this month "proving" the vaccines worked.
The Illusion of Transparency: COVID-19 Mortality Reporting in Long-Term Care
Introduction - Accurate and transparent reporting is essential for protecting society’s most vulnerable-especially those in long-term care (LTC) homes. This analysis examines the Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) report on COVID-19 fatalities in LTC homes (April 2025) and raises important questions about how data is presented to the public and policymakers. By focusing narrowly on COVID-19 case fatalities and reporting only 30-day all-cause mortality among COVID-positive residents, while omitting broader mortality trends for the entire LTC population, the report may unintentionally obscure the true impact of the pandemic and related policies. Understanding what is-and isn’t-included in these reports is crucial for learning from the pandemic and making better decisions in the future.
What Does the VCH Report Show? -The VCH report investigates deaths among LTC residents who tested positive for COVID-19 between January 2020 and June 2022, breaking the data down by pandemic wave and highlighting the drop in fatality rates after vaccines were introduced. Its main message is clear: vaccination significantly reduced the risk of death among LTC residents, and continued vaccination is recommended. Below, we examine whether this conclusion holds up when considering the complete data set.
What’s Missing and Why It Matters - The report does not address a fundamental question: Did more people in long-term care die overall during the pandemic compared to previous years? This is not a minor detail. All-cause mortality-the total number of deaths from any cause in the entire LTC population-is the most direct measure of the pandemic’s impact and the effectiveness of our response.
According to data from the BC Seniors’ Advocate, the annual death rate in LTC homes remained stable in 2020 and 2021, with no significant increase compared to 2019. In fact, the Seniors’ Advocate publicly confirmed there was “no” rise in deaths in 2020. There was only a modest increase in 2022, which quickly returned to baseline in 2023. These numbers suggest that, despite the challenges of COVID-19, overall mortality in LTC homes did not surge as many feared.
Why Comprehensive Data Is Essential - When reports, like the April 2025 VCH one, focus only on COVID-positive deaths or short-term all-cause mortality, without considering total mortality for all LTC residents, they risk giving an incomplete picture. This can affect how families, care workers, and policymakers understand the risks and benefits of interventions like strict visitation rules or vaccine mandates. Transparent, comprehensive data is not just a technical requirement-it’s a matter of public trust and sound decision-making.
A Call for Accountability and Improvement - This is not about assigning blame, but about learning and improving. To make informed decisions that truly protect those in care homes, future reports must include all-cause mortality for the entire LTC population and present the full context.
Reference: COVID-19 fatalities among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 3, April 2025
Another perspective on the BC government April 2025 study promoting vaccine use. Their recent focus appears to be publishing narrower perspective research reports to cherry pick data that supports their Covid-19 era policies. The published on in Feb 2025 and now different one in April 2025. See below.
What the study concluded:
Conclusions: The significant reduction in COVID-related fatality rates among long-term
care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region in association with vaccination uptake
and effectiveness, hybrid immunity, and changing viral strains emphasizes the critical role of
timely vaccinations in safeguarding vulnerable populations.
Senior Review Panel & Peer Review Critique (AI): Vancouver Coastal Health LTC COVID-19 Mortality Study (BCMJ Vol 67, No. 3 dated April 2025)
1. Study Objective and Relevance
The study’s goal-to analyze COVID-19 case fatality rates among long-term care (LTC) residents-is important and addresses a vulnerable population. However, the report’s value is fundamentally limited by its omission of all-cause mortality (ACM) analysis for the full LTC population. It’s narrower perspective is being used to support the vaccine policy in BC despite obvious weaknesses in study design.
2. Critical Omission: All-Cause Mortality (ACM)
ACM is essential for three reasons:
• Error Checking:
ACM provides a direct way to verify the accuracy of cause-specific mortality data. If reported COVID-19 deaths are high but total deaths are stable, this suggests possible misclassification, under-reporting, or over-attribution. Conversely, if both rise together, it supports the validity of the findings.
• Reality Checking:
Only ACM can reveal the true impact of the pandemic and related policies on LTC residents. It captures both direct and indirect effects (e.g., deaths due to isolation, changes in care, or other causes). Without ACM, it is impossible to know whether COVID-19 or the interventions themselves had the greatest impact.
• Credibility and Public Trust:
Transparent reporting of ACM is a cornerstone of epidemiological best practice. Its absence raises questions about selective reporting, undermines the credibility of the study, and risks eroding public trust-especially when ACM data are available and have been used in other peer-reviewed studies.
3. Study Design and Data Sources
• The study uses administrative and surveillance data to track COVID-19 cases and deaths within 30 days among LTC residents.
• However, it fails to include or analyze weekly or monthly ACM for all LTC residents, despite the feasibility and public availability of such data in BC and other jurisdictions.
This is not a minor oversight, but a critical design flaw.
Without ACM, the study cannot be used to validate its own findings or to place them in the proper context.
This was part of an article in the new Weston Price, Wise Traditions, Spring 2025 magazine article, Vaccination Updates, The Ever-Expanding Push for a Lifetime of Shots, by Kendall Nelson, Director
The Greater Good, page 69-75."the CDC unveils its 2025 immunization schedule, over two hundred routine vaccine doses are now recommended throughout a person's lifetime - eighty-five to eighty-eight of which are aimed at children ages zero to eighteen."
That’s insane. Smart humans have to realize that dozens of vaccines, up to 200, no less, is not a healthy thing to do. This is just plain ol’ common sense. You don’t need a degree to come to this conclusion.
They don't make money with us when we are healthy. They don't make money with us when we are dead. We have to be in between and this is where, the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma, will keep us for the rest of our life to sell us their inefficient drugs that will not heal us, but keep us sick!
All of these so called AI programs use official government data and documents apply some rudimentary thought process that is basically the officials said this is the truth. IE they follow the protocol that someone programmed into them. They are incapable of intelligence or wisdom
because its mass killing. every nation is arming. many are with addiction. many are without home. many are without hope. there will be fewer to talk to about this, more will develop dementia. your leading cancers are simply bft & parasite initiated, 'niacin' (NAM & NAD+) mediated. Your sudden MI/CVDs/strokes low niacin (NA, NAM & NAD+). Who speaks of Parp-1? of Foxp3+? or the need to self-vaccinate for that carried within?
Heck, forward your ideas decades ago to China and you're a traitor (PMID: 35684000 - was i surprised? : ) Corrupt is too good a word for some. Contaminated evolution is involution. And relative the false vaccines, work or not - no one needs them. (Pop some NAM, I mean they're now docking it to ivermectin to sell back to you ; ) It's all a lie (just insert the 'f' - 'life' $ 'file'. Stop the vaccines... how they get the graphene into you? (your children watched the first Baymax right?)
Mainstream media will not listen, - because it can't comprehend what is happening (ignor-ance; it ignores Nothing 'lands' or 'impacts'). Vaccines work because it harms as intended and plus - can't vaccinate against stupidity anyway - so they'll push until they eliminate many. The innocent will be sacrificed and slaughtered - while the perpetrator claims amnesty and innocence.
Unfortunately, the words - "...forgive them for they know not what they do..." - describes those who may be unaware, innocent &/or trusting (relative taking vaccines) but also likely serves some maladaptive atonement to the creators of harm and injure (much as the fruit bearing tree provides nourish to the virtuous and villain alike). Money symbol $ - snake on stick, medi-sin snake on a cross. Vaccines are beyond crimes against humanity. Don't need all this AI crap either, maybe just a mirror. Even the word MAN backwards spells NAM : ) just thoughts...
The crazy thing is, an hour later, someone else could interact with Grok and ask it all of these same questions all over again, and it will revert to playing dumb all over again. AI is programmed by the folks that made it, and sadly, very little to no AI I know of on the market currently is trained to be smart, or even honest, about some of these very important issues.
People won't change their opinions of many challenges with truth because of their evil pride and insecurity issues. Politics and their person of choice is a major one. Narcissists aren't about truth, but winning at any cost. Fact is, they have already lost and are too corrupt to admit it.
Why? Because the Media are PAID to NOT Ask Questions; just as Google is paid to omit certain results in your searches.
Mary Talley Bowden MD @MdBreathe
We have opened Pandora's Box. These are all the mRNA products in the pipeline according to Grok.
https://x.com/MdBreathe/status/1918403800039108819
Problem for "them." RFK JR won't approve them without real studies.
We all know that the Covid jabs are a depopulation plan with huge sums of profit or big Pharma and many others. No one will admit anything. People need to wake up and STOP LISTENING TO THE LIES.
I find it interesting that the masses are not questioning MSM's resistance to RFK Jr.'s investigations.
ALL mRNA shots are uncontrollable, unpredictable, and unproven for long-term safety and efficacy.
'In-house safety and efficacy tests/trials' are predetermined to be successful because it's more profitable to avoid reality. Big Pharma is checking its own 'homework'? Profit before safety = catastrophic health issues, but, more importantly, massive profits for Big Pharma!
mRNA vax is, however, guaranteed to cause Adverse Reactions (often serious and incurable), sudden DEATH or, at best, dramatically reduced Life Expectancy
LIABILITY must be immediately reintroduced for all medicines, particularly injections called 'vaccines'. NO LIABILITY is Big Pharma's Licence to Kill with impunity.
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll live longer by avoiding mRNA from unscrupulous doctors and nurses.
Liability For All Injectables & all meds! Period! Reagan’s 1986 Act was diabolical & he was a coward for not standing up to big pHARMa on our behalf! Millions have died ever since. He fundamentally changed the trajectory of the vaccine industry against the people. This is when they officially turned it into a bio weapons program. mRNA LNP technology needs to be banned & removed from the market, worldwide! Now!
Agreed 100%! Mick (UK).
But BC government published a report this month "proving" the vaccines worked.
The Illusion of Transparency: COVID-19 Mortality Reporting in Long-Term Care
Introduction - Accurate and transparent reporting is essential for protecting society’s most vulnerable-especially those in long-term care (LTC) homes. This analysis examines the Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) report on COVID-19 fatalities in LTC homes (April 2025) and raises important questions about how data is presented to the public and policymakers. By focusing narrowly on COVID-19 case fatalities and reporting only 30-day all-cause mortality among COVID-positive residents, while omitting broader mortality trends for the entire LTC population, the report may unintentionally obscure the true impact of the pandemic and related policies. Understanding what is-and isn’t-included in these reports is crucial for learning from the pandemic and making better decisions in the future.
What Does the VCH Report Show? -The VCH report investigates deaths among LTC residents who tested positive for COVID-19 between January 2020 and June 2022, breaking the data down by pandemic wave and highlighting the drop in fatality rates after vaccines were introduced. Its main message is clear: vaccination significantly reduced the risk of death among LTC residents, and continued vaccination is recommended. Below, we examine whether this conclusion holds up when considering the complete data set.
What’s Missing and Why It Matters - The report does not address a fundamental question: Did more people in long-term care die overall during the pandemic compared to previous years? This is not a minor detail. All-cause mortality-the total number of deaths from any cause in the entire LTC population-is the most direct measure of the pandemic’s impact and the effectiveness of our response.
According to data from the BC Seniors’ Advocate, the annual death rate in LTC homes remained stable in 2020 and 2021, with no significant increase compared to 2019. In fact, the Seniors’ Advocate publicly confirmed there was “no” rise in deaths in 2020. There was only a modest increase in 2022, which quickly returned to baseline in 2023. These numbers suggest that, despite the challenges of COVID-19, overall mortality in LTC homes did not surge as many feared.
Why Comprehensive Data Is Essential - When reports, like the April 2025 VCH one, focus only on COVID-positive deaths or short-term all-cause mortality, without considering total mortality for all LTC residents, they risk giving an incomplete picture. This can affect how families, care workers, and policymakers understand the risks and benefits of interventions like strict visitation rules or vaccine mandates. Transparent, comprehensive data is not just a technical requirement-it’s a matter of public trust and sound decision-making.
A Call for Accountability and Improvement - This is not about assigning blame, but about learning and improving. To make informed decisions that truly protect those in care homes, future reports must include all-cause mortality for the entire LTC population and present the full context.
Reference: COVID-19 fatalities among long-term care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, BCMJ, Vol. 67, No. 3, April 2025
Did Canada compare DEADLY Vax results to IVERMECTIN? Mick.
Another perspective on the BC government April 2025 study promoting vaccine use. Their recent focus appears to be publishing narrower perspective research reports to cherry pick data that supports their Covid-19 era policies. The published on in Feb 2025 and now different one in April 2025. See below.
What the study concluded:
Conclusions: The significant reduction in COVID-related fatality rates among long-term
care residents in the Vancouver Coastal Health region in association with vaccination uptake
and effectiveness, hybrid immunity, and changing viral strains emphasizes the critical role of
timely vaccinations in safeguarding vulnerable populations.
https://bcmj.org/sites/default/files/BCMJ_Vol67_No3_COVID-19-fatalities.pdf
Senior Review Panel & Peer Review Critique (AI): Vancouver Coastal Health LTC COVID-19 Mortality Study (BCMJ Vol 67, No. 3 dated April 2025)
1. Study Objective and Relevance
The study’s goal-to analyze COVID-19 case fatality rates among long-term care (LTC) residents-is important and addresses a vulnerable population. However, the report’s value is fundamentally limited by its omission of all-cause mortality (ACM) analysis for the full LTC population. It’s narrower perspective is being used to support the vaccine policy in BC despite obvious weaknesses in study design.
2. Critical Omission: All-Cause Mortality (ACM)
ACM is essential for three reasons:
• Error Checking:
ACM provides a direct way to verify the accuracy of cause-specific mortality data. If reported COVID-19 deaths are high but total deaths are stable, this suggests possible misclassification, under-reporting, or over-attribution. Conversely, if both rise together, it supports the validity of the findings.
• Reality Checking:
Only ACM can reveal the true impact of the pandemic and related policies on LTC residents. It captures both direct and indirect effects (e.g., deaths due to isolation, changes in care, or other causes). Without ACM, it is impossible to know whether COVID-19 or the interventions themselves had the greatest impact.
• Credibility and Public Trust:
Transparent reporting of ACM is a cornerstone of epidemiological best practice. Its absence raises questions about selective reporting, undermines the credibility of the study, and risks eroding public trust-especially when ACM data are available and have been used in other peer-reviewed studies.
3. Study Design and Data Sources
• The study uses administrative and surveillance data to track COVID-19 cases and deaths within 30 days among LTC residents.
• However, it fails to include or analyze weekly or monthly ACM for all LTC residents, despite the feasibility and public availability of such data in BC and other jurisdictions.
This is not a minor oversight, but a critical design flaw.
Without ACM, the study cannot be used to validate its own findings or to place them in the proper context.
While it is nice to get AI confirmation, I think it detracts from the stunning relevance of this study.
Not extrapolation - 1:1 comparison data of millions of people.
About a thousand times stronger than an average study....
Of course - they couldn't compare to the unvaccinated... unfortunately the new trend. Limited hangout tactic...
If Grok's on board, count me in!
(Grok and I are like 🤞 this.)
I don't think we can assume that Moderna shots are safe either.
This was part of an article in the new Weston Price, Wise Traditions, Spring 2025 magazine article, Vaccination Updates, The Ever-Expanding Push for a Lifetime of Shots, by Kendall Nelson, Director
The Greater Good, page 69-75."the CDC unveils its 2025 immunization schedule, over two hundred routine vaccine doses are now recommended throughout a person's lifetime - eighty-five to eighty-eight of which are aimed at children ages zero to eighteen."
That’s insane. Smart humans have to realize that dozens of vaccines, up to 200, no less, is not a healthy thing to do. This is just plain ol’ common sense. You don’t need a degree to come to this conclusion.
Yes indeed, it is completely insane.
They don't make money with us when we are healthy. They don't make money with us when we are dead. We have to be in between and this is where, the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma, will keep us for the rest of our life to sell us their inefficient drugs that will not heal us, but keep us sick!
Yep
All of these so called AI programs use official government data and documents apply some rudimentary thought process that is basically the officials said this is the truth. IE they follow the protocol that someone programmed into them. They are incapable of intelligence or wisdom
I'm sure you know what you're doing, but I'd be careful with ai engagements of any kind. I do believe it's like dancing with the devil.
because its mass killing. every nation is arming. many are with addiction. many are without home. many are without hope. there will be fewer to talk to about this, more will develop dementia. your leading cancers are simply bft & parasite initiated, 'niacin' (NAM & NAD+) mediated. Your sudden MI/CVDs/strokes low niacin (NA, NAM & NAD+). Who speaks of Parp-1? of Foxp3+? or the need to self-vaccinate for that carried within?
Heck, forward your ideas decades ago to China and you're a traitor (PMID: 35684000 - was i surprised? : ) Corrupt is too good a word for some. Contaminated evolution is involution. And relative the false vaccines, work or not - no one needs them. (Pop some NAM, I mean they're now docking it to ivermectin to sell back to you ; ) It's all a lie (just insert the 'f' - 'life' $ 'file'. Stop the vaccines... how they get the graphene into you? (your children watched the first Baymax right?)
Mainstream media will not listen, - because it can't comprehend what is happening (ignor-ance; it ignores Nothing 'lands' or 'impacts'). Vaccines work because it harms as intended and plus - can't vaccinate against stupidity anyway - so they'll push until they eliminate many. The innocent will be sacrificed and slaughtered - while the perpetrator claims amnesty and innocence.
Unfortunately, the words - "...forgive them for they know not what they do..." - describes those who may be unaware, innocent &/or trusting (relative taking vaccines) but also likely serves some maladaptive atonement to the creators of harm and injure (much as the fruit bearing tree provides nourish to the virtuous and villain alike). Money symbol $ - snake on stick, medi-sin snake on a cross. Vaccines are beyond crimes against humanity. Don't need all this AI crap either, maybe just a mirror. Even the word MAN backwards spells NAM : ) just thoughts...
https://open.substack.com/pub/oliverennis/p/covid-and-vax-addictions-aggression?r=5eo0n8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Have you sent this data to RFKjr?