FDA discovers fountain of youth

If you take this drug, you won't die of any diseases and your chance of dying in an accident is reduced as well.

Update

The paper was published in a peer-reviewed journal (Vaccine) in Jan 2023. The Pfizer shot is now in table 4. It’s a 78% reduction in non-COVID deaths after just two shots of the vaccine (from a .09 death rate to a .02 death rate).

If the paper were true of course, we'd see a DRAMATIC drop in all-cause mortality numbers in the 18-44 group. We don't. The paper is obviously flawed, but it supports the narrative so it gets published. This just shows you how shoddy the review process is and that nobody objects when a fraudulent paper gets published.

Here are the 15 leading causes of death in 2021 in 20-44 age group which account for 198,636 out of a total of 232,113 total deaths:

So if you calculate the percentages of non-COVID deaths for 2021 you get this:

So to get a 78% reduction in non-COVID deaths after 2 shot of Pfizer is truly stunning, isn’t it? It means the shots will reduce your risk of an accident, suicide, homicide, etc. to near zero.

What I don’t understand is how taking a vaccine can reduce your risk of accidents and homicide. Where is the biological plausibility of that?

Introduction

Janet Woodcock, interim head of the FDA, recently emailed me a link to a study of an existing drug that shows that people who take the drug appear to be almost immortal.

It cuts you risk of death by more than two-thirds… it means you basically can’t die of any disease and you are also less likely to die of an accident.

In short, it’s a wonder drug that everyone should be rushing to go out and get. It can do something nothing else can reliably do: double your lifespan.

There were no criticisms of the study from the mainstream medical community that I was able to find. It has not been retracted.

Can you guess what this wonder drug is? It would have been my last guess.

If you aren’t a paid subscriber, you’ll see a paywall here. Your subscription goes to supporting substack (which is a great platform for free speech) and 100% of the proceeds that are given to me I donate to supporting work of VSRF. So it is for a good cause. If you think the vaccines are unsafe, please subscribe and register your enthusiastic support for our efforts. Thanks!

The COVID vaccines of course!

The CDC just released an analysis using data from VSD that after you get vaccinated, your all-cause mortality drops by 72% if you are age 18-44.

Since around 33% of deaths in that age group are from accidents, that means that it drives death from ALL diseases to ZERO and it ALSO reduces chance of dying in an accident!

But here’s the amazing thing… NOBODY in mainstream academia has criticized the study as nonsensical.

This proves that the CDC can put absurd studies out, and the medical community and the press just eats it up without question. Let me know in the comments if you found a single mainstream academic criticizing the study!

Truly stunning! See Table 2.

Let’s be clear… this is a deeply flawed study because it is either:

1. Hopelessly confounded (which to her credit Janet Woodcock recognized) or, more likely,

2. because non-COVID vaxxed ACM deaths are being miscategorized as unvaxed non-ACM deaths

3. or both.

Yet the paper says, “All vaccinated racial and ethnic groups had lower mortality risks than did unvaccinated comparison groups.”

There is no known mechanism of action to explain a 69% overall decrease in ACM for all age groups. It certainly didn’t show up in any of the trials. Not even close. The Pfizer trial showed a 40% increase in ACM, and a 54% increase in non-ACM.

THEY CANNOT BOTH BE RIGHT. Either the clinical trial is wrong or this study is wrong. In my mind, this isn’t a close call. The VSD study is wrong.

VAERS, the UK ONS data, the Pfizer trial, and direct physician reports are all consistent showing a huge increase in non-COVID ACM.

The vaccines are super dangerous and cause more harm than good for all age groups.

I am not alone in pointing out these flaws. Mathew Crawford noticed the same “fountain of youth” effect in this paper that I did.

That the CDC could publish a study like this is deeply troubling.

Crawford in fact thinks a case can be made that the vaccines actually do nothing at all. The recent UC Davis/UCSF study certainly is consistent with that hypothesis.

So there is absolutely no mechanism of action for such an effect and the VAERS adverse event stats for the vaccines are off the charts.

Please, don’t act on this study. It could cost you your life.

The reality is exactly the opposite what the CDC study shows. See my article on vaccine mandates for the evidence showing that vaccination makes thing worse.