Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Green Hornet's avatar

It means:

At best, they would have to admit they were wrong about the jabs which would cause a cascade of dominoes falling at every corrupt 3 letter DC agency.

At worst, they've committed murder and are trying to cover their crimes in order to stay out of prison and/or the chair.

Have you realized yet that you are not dealing with rational moral people like you?

Expand full comment
Brian Lewis's avatar

We often approach parties who are most likely guilty and try to get them to amend their ways, and I don't think I've ever seen this work. The reason seems straightforward: the guilty parties are simply not good people, and have been installed in their positions because they can be relied upon to serve the evil machinations.

I think it's time for a different approach. Instead of approaching the guilty parties, let's put our minds toward finding the people who have the power to cause significant levels of annoyance to the guilty parties. For example, let's not ask the FAA to investigate itself. Let's send packages of evidence to the people who have the power to instigate hostile investigations of the FAA, if there are any such people.

Other people will probably come up with much more delicious ways of causing trouble for our adversaries than I can. But let's stop approaching bad people and being disappointed when they don't do the right thing. Let's figure out what they would most dislike, and then help that actually happen.

Expand full comment
571 more comments...

No posts