I'm confused by this post. I looked at the CDC page that S.K. linked in the sub-stack post that I'm responding to. (CDC page linked by S.K.: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html).
I only briefly glanced at the IDSA page. Just long enough to see that it doesn't refute the CDC pa…
I only briefly glanced at the IDSA page. Just long enough to see that it doesn't refute the CDC page.
The CDC page included 18 studies showing masks to be effective against COVID-19. I can toss out two of the studies: the Bangladesh study and the one study from China. But that leaves 16 that I have as yet no reason to reject, all showing masks being effective. against COVID.
How does this post refute the assertion of the effectiveness of masks against COVID-19? This post seems to me to support, rather than refute, the assertion.
I'm confused by this post. I looked at the CDC page that S.K. linked in the sub-stack post that I'm responding to. (CDC page linked by S.K.: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.html).
I only briefly glanced at the IDSA page. Just long enough to see that it doesn't refute the CDC page.
The CDC page included 18 studies showing masks to be effective against COVID-19. I can toss out two of the studies: the Bangladesh study and the one study from China. But that leaves 16 that I have as yet no reason to reject, all showing masks being effective. against COVID.
How does this post refute the assertion of the effectiveness of masks against COVID-19? This post seems to me to support, rather than refute, the assertion.
What did I miss?