I'm not sure if it was Lanka's or someone elses, but I think part of the experiment was that samples which didn't have any viral particles added to them had pictures identical to the ones with viral particles. Additionally, PCR from non viral samples returned positive results for few different viruses depending what you asked to find. PC…
I'm not sure if it was Lanka's or someone elses, but I think part of the experiment was that samples which didn't have any viral particles added to them had pictures identical to the ones with viral particles. Additionally, PCR from non viral samples returned positive results for few different viruses depending what you asked to find. PCR was positive for measles, flu, sars-cov-2 etc.
I guess, their claim is misrepresented. No one denise people are sick and signs and symptoms are consistent with i.e. Covid-19 or measles etc. The claim is that the current scientific method doesn't prove that it exists when both viral and non-viral sample pictures look the same and using PCR returns positive result depending what you ask it to look for. In comparison, bacterial culture when grown can be clearly visualised and based on its shape, staining we can determine the type of bacteria it is.
I suppose the problem with the claim that 600 labs repeat the same protocol and get same results is problematic if non-viral samples can also return positive results depending what you ask PCR machine to look for. Especially at high threshold cycles 40+ (standard number for most labs). Even Dr Science (aka Fauci) said that possibility that PCR run at 25+ threshold cycles is truely positive are miniscule.
I'm not sure if it was Lanka's or someone elses, but I think part of the experiment was that samples which didn't have any viral particles added to them had pictures identical to the ones with viral particles. Additionally, PCR from non viral samples returned positive results for few different viruses depending what you asked to find. PCR was positive for measles, flu, sars-cov-2 etc.
I guess, their claim is misrepresented. No one denise people are sick and signs and symptoms are consistent with i.e. Covid-19 or measles etc. The claim is that the current scientific method doesn't prove that it exists when both viral and non-viral sample pictures look the same and using PCR returns positive result depending what you ask it to look for. In comparison, bacterial culture when grown can be clearly visualised and based on its shape, staining we can determine the type of bacteria it is.
I suppose the problem with the claim that 600 labs repeat the same protocol and get same results is problematic if non-viral samples can also return positive results depending what you ask PCR machine to look for. Especially at high threshold cycles 40+ (standard number for most labs). Even Dr Science (aka Fauci) said that possibility that PCR run at 25+ threshold cycles is truely positive are miniscule.