Nonsense.
That the scam as it has played out DOES NOT REQUIRE the existence of any causative agent, let alone a novel one, is a strong argument for non-existence is nonsense? You acknowledge it’s one big lie, no? Why the hand waving response, then?
The fact that something is not required is NOT evidence of its non-existence. We don't NEED you here, yet here you are, trying to distract.
Nonsense.
That the scam as it has played out DOES NOT REQUIRE the existence of any causative agent, let alone a novel one, is a strong argument for non-existence is nonsense? You acknowledge it’s one big lie, no? Why the hand waving response, then?
The fact that something is not required is NOT evidence of its non-existence. We don't NEED you here, yet here you are, trying to distract.