Discover more from Steve Kirsch's newsletter

I write about COVID mitigation policies, vaccines, neurological diseases and conditions, corruption, censorship, and early treatments. The data shows that vaccines are ruining the health of Americans and driving the epidemic in neurological conditions.

Over 230,000 subscribers

Did I just find a medical review board that is not corrupt??

I'm not going to tell you the answer here... vote, and then I'll tell you a fascinating story.

Steve Kirsch

Apr 21, 2023

627

246

Executive summary

Did I finally find a medical board that is not corrupt?

Lock in your answer right here, then continue reading

Earlier this month, the Regional Council of Medicine of the State of Amazonas (CREMAM) unanimously acquitted Dr. Flavio Cadegiani, physician, scientist and lead author of research on proxalutamide to treat COVID-19. The northern arm of the study took place in six cities in the Amazon. All charges were dropped after the doctor's innocence was proven.

Click the image to read the article in English.

Flavio Cadegiani was unanimously exonerated of all charges by a medical review board. How did this happen?

Study praised in the world

In Brazil, the study was mercilessly attacked by the press, which generated a wave of complaints in medical councils. However, abroad, in the most renowned scientific institutions in the world, the high quality of the study was attested.

At Canada's McMaster University, the birthplace of Evidence-Based Medicine, the study was rated one of the highest marks among all COVID drug studies. The same happened with the analysis of the COVID-NMA website , linked to Cochrane, France, which seeks to analyze scientific evidence of treatments. There, they concluded that there was little bias, which proves the soundness of the work.

Read the entire article

I hope you’ll read the entire article which also includes allegations of fraud that were also found to be completely without merit.

An honest scientific review board?

So how was Cadegiani exonerated? Is it because the review board consisted of honest scientists for a change?

Sadly, the answer is that the review board is corrupt and they wanted to skewer him, but they simply lacked any evidence to justify doing so.

Summary

So if you answered “No” in the survey above, give yourself a pat on the back.

The sad truth is that I have yet to find an honest medical review board anywhere on the planet.

I’m still looking.