Nearly 30,000 people were surveyed. You had a 6X greater risk of hospitalization post vaccine than post infection. This is a disaster and should cause the vaccines to be revoked in any sane society.
Do you have any idea what the number of deaths might be from all hospitalizations? This should be taken into account if there is a comparison of deaths from hospitalizations for Covid versus the death rate for hospitalizations for non-Covid, don't you think?
My husband went into a coma after a booster. I wish I’d had the courage to refuse that lousy shot for him. But the government bullshit did a good job of scaring me. Never again.
STEVE THEY ARE STILL PUSHING THE JAB IN UK AS THE FOURTH LETTER ASKING FOR ME TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO GET JABED. THIS TIME WITH MY FULL NAME ON IT. MAKE A BOOKING SO OTHERS DO NOT LOOSE ONE. SPRING JAB BUT NOW AVALABLE TILL JUNE. PREHAPS THE TAKEUP IS LOW.. THEY HAVE TO KEEP JABBING SO COVID WILL CARRY ON AND KEEP SPREADING. THE MORE JABBING THE MORE MONEY BIG PHARMA MAKE. MY LETTER WAS SENT BY THE NHS OUR FREE HEALTH SERVICE,WHO ARE RUN AND CONTROLED BY BIG PHARMA.;. IT IS NOT A VACCINE AND NEVER WAS. SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM AS IT HAS SPIKE PROTINE. WILL NEVER OBTAIN A LICENCE AS A JAB HAS TO ALL REMAIN IN THE ARM MUSLE. WITH THE JAB ONLY ONE THIRD DOES SO NO LICENCE. THE JAB IS AN UNLICENCED ILLIGAL MEDICAL PRODUCT..
Since covid, was simply the common yearly detox that many go through typically label FLU, and since the vaccine was full of toxins which is what the FLU is trying to rid a body of, I'd make an educated deduction that the bodies of those who were trying to detox were overloaded with toxins, thus causing an issue that debilitated them beyond any normal occurrence that the flu would have caused. After all...if you put THESE into your body, what could you EXPECT? But who reads ingredients except skeptics like myself?
Surely no SANE society would have been putting this in their Creator given bodies in the FIRST PLACE!!
Pfizer Vaccine: The “full list” of ingredients for the Pfizer vaccine is:
I spit my coffee out laughing when you asked, "Why didn't the CDC let us know...", Steve. I am glad you include a little comedic content with your column. It makes the sad news easier to swallow, even if the coffee is moving retrograde through my oropharynx.
As we all know, the CDC is/was(?) a captured agency, completely beholding to $Pharma$. Perhaps that is changing, as we wait to see the changes instituted...
Steve, “How could a signal this huge NOT show up in the randomized trials as a difference in the treatment vs. placebo group?” Answer: It did. When the Pfizer 6 Month Safety and Efficacy report and supplementary appendix came out on medrxiv.org in the summer of 2021, I asked, “Most people want to avoid death and severe health events; so, what does the Pfizer Six Month Safety and Efficacy report advise?”
(see calculation details in reply to this post)
So, for the people in Pfizer’s study, according to Pfizer’s own data – If you want to avoid death and severe health events should you get the Pfizer vaccine?
If we follow the NIH guidelines and report NNT, number needed to treat, these are the results. According to Pfizer’s data:
No mortality benefit and . . .
We need to treat 773 people with the Pfizer vaccine for 1 person to avoid Severe COVID-19.
However, if we treat 773 people with the Pfizer vaccine about 4 suffer a Severe Adverse Event.
Let’s start by looking at what Pfizer says about mortality, “Causes of death were balanced between BNT162b2 and placebo groups (Table S4).” Given 20 (15+5) who received the vaccine died and 14 who received the placebo died out of more than 22,000 in each group, this is within the realm of natural sampling variability for the data presented so the statement is plausible.
Now let’s look at avoiding severe health events. Most people are not worried about having typical cold symptoms or minor side effects from a medicine or a vaccine (sore arm, etc.). So, I focused on the “Severe” data provided in the report. (see NIH Common terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Table S6 shows the vaccine group was much less likely to get Severe COVID-19 (1 out of 22,505 for the Vaccine group vs 30 out of 22,435 for the Placebo group). However, Table S3 shows the vaccinated were more likely to suffer a Severe Adverse Event (262 out of 21,926 for the vaccine group vs 150 out of 21,921 for the placebo group). Since I don’t want anyone to suffer a “Severe” medical outcome, Severe COVID-19 + Severe Adverse Events = Total Severe Health Events. According to Pfizer’s study Total Severe Health Events were 263 (1+262) in the Vaccine group and 180 (30+150) in the Placebo group. Was this difference just due to chance? If there really were no difference in the rate of Severe Health Events between the two groups, then the likelihood of seeing this difference or one larger due to chance is about 1 in 27,000 (Two Proportion Z-test P-value of 0.000037).
"This is a disaster and should cause the vaccines to be revoked in any sane society".
One need remember this is NOT a sane society; especially in one in which the sole desired outcome of said 'vaccine' is to eliminate as many of us as possible. Having said that, it will continue, unabated.
Indeed. Even a Hollywood script got it right, at least once, in "Like Father, Like Son", when Dudley Moore says something like, "we all take the hypocritical oath, don't we?"
With a ridiculously over-stated false positive rate that leads to anyone diagnosed "with Covid-19" from a 40+ ct PCR test, it's no wonder that the "Result: 3 to 6 times more likely to die if you chose the vaccine. It’s clearly not that high (if it was, the all cause mortality numbers would be much higher)"... Likely if you can somehow account for all the false positives in the unvaccinated "post-infection" [as confirmed by said PCR tests] individuals, it would likely come into agreement with the all cause mortality differences. Conversely, I'm not sure how or whether there would be false negatives in the vaccinated COVID-naïve individuals (also presumably confirmed by these same PCR tests). The problem with garbage data...
...which also led to all of the damage caused by the world leaders'/dictators' atrocious response to what turned out to be a failed/under-delivered bioweapon that itself was not nearly as terrible as its countermeasure, which may have been less damaging to humanity in the end than what the fools in charge rolled out to help (lesson for all: whenever you hear "we are from the government and we are here to help", gather your pitchforks and/or run for the hills). If there is hope that AI/ML can somehow untangle this mess in an explainable manner, that would be a huge step in the right direction. All of that said, thanks for your continued efforts in this direction Steve!
Another new study has just been published:
"Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives."
This is the most extensive review and comparison of MYOCARDITIS after COVID-19 Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection ever published!
Conclusion: "We urge governments to remove the COVID-19 mRNA products from the market due to the well-documented risk of myocardial damage"
https://cardiovascular-research-and-innovation.reseaprojournals.com/Articles/myocarditis-after-sars-cov-2-infection-and-covid-19-vaccination-epidemiology-outcomes-and-new-perspectives
They got the result they wanted
Steve,
Do you have any idea what the number of deaths might be from all hospitalizations? This should be taken into account if there is a comparison of deaths from hospitalizations for Covid versus the death rate for hospitalizations for non-Covid, don't you think?
Do we know over what time period?
Prosecution for all responsible 🤨
Stop takeing them why are so many still takeing boosters ?? Do they want to die or get some other horror ??.
“Clearly not that high”.
Suggest it will be.
My husband went into a coma after a booster. I wish I’d had the courage to refuse that lousy shot for him. But the government bullshit did a good job of scaring me. Never again.
STEVE THEY ARE STILL PUSHING THE JAB IN UK AS THE FOURTH LETTER ASKING FOR ME TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO GET JABED. THIS TIME WITH MY FULL NAME ON IT. MAKE A BOOKING SO OTHERS DO NOT LOOSE ONE. SPRING JAB BUT NOW AVALABLE TILL JUNE. PREHAPS THE TAKEUP IS LOW.. THEY HAVE TO KEEP JABBING SO COVID WILL CARRY ON AND KEEP SPREADING. THE MORE JABBING THE MORE MONEY BIG PHARMA MAKE. MY LETTER WAS SENT BY THE NHS OUR FREE HEALTH SERVICE,WHO ARE RUN AND CONTROLED BY BIG PHARMA.;. IT IS NOT A VACCINE AND NEVER WAS. SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM AS IT HAS SPIKE PROTINE. WILL NEVER OBTAIN A LICENCE AS A JAB HAS TO ALL REMAIN IN THE ARM MUSLE. WITH THE JAB ONLY ONE THIRD DOES SO NO LICENCE. THE JAB IS AN UNLICENCED ILLIGAL MEDICAL PRODUCT..
Since covid, was simply the common yearly detox that many go through typically label FLU, and since the vaccine was full of toxins which is what the FLU is trying to rid a body of, I'd make an educated deduction that the bodies of those who were trying to detox were overloaded with toxins, thus causing an issue that debilitated them beyond any normal occurrence that the flu would have caused. After all...if you put THESE into your body, what could you EXPECT? But who reads ingredients except skeptics like myself?
Surely no SANE society would have been putting this in their Creator given bodies in the FIRST PLACE!!
Pfizer Vaccine: The “full list” of ingredients for the Pfizer vaccine is:
mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2
[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-
phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium
phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.
Moderna Vaccine: The “full list” of ingredients for the Moderna vaccine is:
Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000
dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]),
tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate trihydrate, and sucrose.
Johnson & Johnson Vaccine: The “full list” of ingredients for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is:
Recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, citric acid monohydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, ethanol, 2 hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD), polysorbate-80, sodium chloride.
https://www.courageouslion.us/p/toxicology-vs-virology
I spit my coffee out laughing when you asked, "Why didn't the CDC let us know...", Steve. I am glad you include a little comedic content with your column. It makes the sad news easier to swallow, even if the coffee is moving retrograde through my oropharynx.
As we all know, the CDC is/was(?) a captured agency, completely beholding to $Pharma$. Perhaps that is changing, as we wait to see the changes instituted...
Steve, “How could a signal this huge NOT show up in the randomized trials as a difference in the treatment vs. placebo group?” Answer: It did. When the Pfizer 6 Month Safety and Efficacy report and supplementary appendix came out on medrxiv.org in the summer of 2021, I asked, “Most people want to avoid death and severe health events; so, what does the Pfizer Six Month Safety and Efficacy report advise?”
(see calculation details in reply to this post)
So, for the people in Pfizer’s study, according to Pfizer’s own data – If you want to avoid death and severe health events should you get the Pfizer vaccine?
If we follow the NIH guidelines and report NNT, number needed to treat, these are the results. According to Pfizer’s data:
No mortality benefit and . . .
We need to treat 773 people with the Pfizer vaccine for 1 person to avoid Severe COVID-19.
However, if we treat 773 people with the Pfizer vaccine about 4 suffer a Severe Adverse Event.
Calculation details:
Let’s start by looking at what Pfizer says about mortality, “Causes of death were balanced between BNT162b2 and placebo groups (Table S4).” Given 20 (15+5) who received the vaccine died and 14 who received the placebo died out of more than 22,000 in each group, this is within the realm of natural sampling variability for the data presented so the statement is plausible.
Now let’s look at avoiding severe health events. Most people are not worried about having typical cold symptoms or minor side effects from a medicine or a vaccine (sore arm, etc.). So, I focused on the “Severe” data provided in the report. (see NIH Common terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Table S6 shows the vaccine group was much less likely to get Severe COVID-19 (1 out of 22,505 for the Vaccine group vs 30 out of 22,435 for the Placebo group). However, Table S3 shows the vaccinated were more likely to suffer a Severe Adverse Event (262 out of 21,926 for the vaccine group vs 150 out of 21,921 for the placebo group). Since I don’t want anyone to suffer a “Severe” medical outcome, Severe COVID-19 + Severe Adverse Events = Total Severe Health Events. According to Pfizer’s study Total Severe Health Events were 263 (1+262) in the Vaccine group and 180 (30+150) in the Placebo group. Was this difference just due to chance? If there really were no difference in the rate of Severe Health Events between the two groups, then the likelihood of seeing this difference or one larger due to chance is about 1 in 27,000 (Two Proportion Z-test P-value of 0.000037).
Love this analysis.
"This is a disaster and should cause the vaccines to be revoked in any sane society".
One need remember this is NOT a sane society; especially in one in which the sole desired outcome of said 'vaccine' is to eliminate as many of us as possible. Having said that, it will continue, unabated.
I took the Hippocratic oath seriously. Maybe too many misread as the Hippcritic Oath
Indeed. Even a Hollywood script got it right, at least once, in "Like Father, Like Son", when Dudley Moore says something like, "we all take the hypocritical oath, don't we?"
In any sane society this pharma concoction should never see the day light in the first place.
With a ridiculously over-stated false positive rate that leads to anyone diagnosed "with Covid-19" from a 40+ ct PCR test, it's no wonder that the "Result: 3 to 6 times more likely to die if you chose the vaccine. It’s clearly not that high (if it was, the all cause mortality numbers would be much higher)"... Likely if you can somehow account for all the false positives in the unvaccinated "post-infection" [as confirmed by said PCR tests] individuals, it would likely come into agreement with the all cause mortality differences. Conversely, I'm not sure how or whether there would be false negatives in the vaccinated COVID-naïve individuals (also presumably confirmed by these same PCR tests). The problem with garbage data...
...which also led to all of the damage caused by the world leaders'/dictators' atrocious response to what turned out to be a failed/under-delivered bioweapon that itself was not nearly as terrible as its countermeasure, which may have been less damaging to humanity in the end than what the fools in charge rolled out to help (lesson for all: whenever you hear "we are from the government and we are here to help", gather your pitchforks and/or run for the hills). If there is hope that AI/ML can somehow untangle this mess in an explainable manner, that would be a huge step in the right direction. All of that said, thanks for your continued efforts in this direction Steve!