In Jacobsen vs Massachusetts, circa early last century, the US Supreme Court of the day decided, in its questionable wisdom, that the State has authority over individual choice. Hence the world we live in now, mandates for jabs, like it or not, whether necessary or not, and even despite r…
In Jacobsen vs Massachusetts, circa early last century, the US Supreme Court of the day decided, in its questionable wisdom, that the State has authority over individual choice. Hence the world we live in now, mandates for jabs, like it or not, whether necessary or not, and even despite risk of serious individual harm, including death.
We all need Alexis to get through this, to then be able to tell her story personally.
Her case may be the extremely graphic poster case sufficient to sway judges in matters of 'informed consent' and 'right to choose'.
A belated realisation.
Alexis' case may be pivotal.
In Jacobsen vs Massachusetts, circa early last century, the US Supreme Court of the day decided, in its questionable wisdom, that the State has authority over individual choice. Hence the world we live in now, mandates for jabs, like it or not, whether necessary or not, and even despite risk of serious individual harm, including death.
We all need Alexis to get through this, to then be able to tell her story personally.
Her case may be the extremely graphic poster case sufficient to sway judges in matters of 'informed consent' and 'right to choose'.