Is there a way for readers of this story to 'go for the throats' of the alleged culprits, haematologist (Zahra Pakbaz), and that so-called doctor's managers, and the hospital admin staff that endorse the policy/ies allegedly applied by Pakbaz? Or would doing so be premature in not allowing 'due process' of investigation, and the decision…
Is there a way for readers of this story to 'go for the throats' of the alleged culprits, haematologist (Zahra Pakbaz), and that so-called doctor's managers, and the hospital admin staff that endorse the policy/ies allegedly applied by Pakbaz? Or would doing so be premature in not allowing 'due process' of investigation, and the decision of a court?
(I am only qualifying with the term 'alleged', as only personal testimony by the victim, Alexis, may attest as to who, what, when, etc. No doubt the hospital staff will have done, or do, everything to erase written records/accountability.)
Is there a way for readers of this story to 'go for the throats' of the alleged culprits, haematologist (Zahra Pakbaz), and that so-called doctor's managers, and the hospital admin staff that endorse the policy/ies allegedly applied by Pakbaz? Or would doing so be premature in not allowing 'due process' of investigation, and the decision of a court?
(I am only qualifying with the term 'alleged', as only personal testimony by the victim, Alexis, may attest as to who, what, when, etc. No doubt the hospital staff will have done, or do, everything to erase written records/accountability.)