Jake Scott and Jeffrey Morris both claim you can ignore the ground-breaking Henry Ford vaxxed/unvaxxed study. The KM curves are the smoking gun that they can't explain.
So many decided to do the unconscionable - take the vax to keep their job. They were intimidated by the medical cabal, by their employer, and all the way up to the miserable president. Coercion led to compromise, and for many a compromise necessary to put food on the table.
Zervos did the same. Coerced and compromised. Now who do we trust - not Zervos. He caved.
The medical cabal's gaslighting and lies will continue until everyone says ... enough. 'An Inconvenient Study' is all the evidence needed to prove we need a new direction in our medical industry. Better yet, take control of your own health. MAHA.
Just watched the film...very well done. Those that refuse to even acknowledge there is a problem, let alone refuse to study the issue are the face of true evil. I think the strong-arm suppression of data like this is to protect a medical/insurance-industrial complex that would collapse if we suddenly stop producing chronically ill citizens. Extrapolate the numbers of chronic conditions seen in the unvaxxed cohort of studies like this to the entire population. What would happen. Pediatricians would be irrelevant (like they were prior to our out of control vaccination schedule). Doctors specializing in all of the chronic conditions that are caused by these vaccinations would barely be needed. Throw in real education on diet and health, with incentives to stay healthy and maybe the five trillion dollar health care industry collapses. I am not saying that there still won't be people with chronic illnesses but what if we can reduce the numbers by even 10% ? Wouldn't it be worth it?
Shocking that when you see a physician 7 times per year (vaccinated group) they're more likely to diagnose a disease than when you see a physician only 2 times per year (unvaccinated group). The vaccinated group was also watched for twice as long (follow up time of approx 2.7 years in vaccinated vs 1.3 years in unvaccinated). More time = more opportunity for diagnosis.
That's just one confounder, not even addressing poor methods, unrecognized confounders, statistic implausibilities, decreased power of the smaller sample size in unvaccinated, attrition bias, etc. It's very easy to feed this crap to laypeople who don't have enough background knowledge to see through all of that.
Steve, AlterAI is very helpful thank you for sharing. I was working on a Grok 4 analysis and unsurprisingly was feeling vexed by its underlying authority sources and assumptions assumed as fact. I crafted a list of questions based on the AlterAI output and entered it in my Grok 4 model. After which I asked Grok 4 "What actions would you suggest as being reasonable based on the Henry Ford Study?" Here is a link to the questions I posed and Groks answers along with Grok's response to the final question. https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_5c1f63bd-733f-468c-bf32-20e75c634ce1
You jumped and wrote all these false tweets implying I hadn't seen the Kaplan-Meier plot and then changed my story when you pointed it out, which are all demonstrable lies.
You can't counter my actual scientific points, so you have to lie and make s**t up to try to discredit me huh, Steve?
Every point I made in my critique of this study holds, and I have not changed them.
There is something Zervos et al. did very good. Once they started finding the results they could have just tossed everything. BUT, they went all the way and created a finilized paper. Writting a paper like that, just writing, takes a lot of time. And they wraped it up.
Steve, when I clicked the link for the "Unbiased AI take: detailed take-down of all the arguments posed by Morris and Scott", I got a "404 shared chat not found" error. Can you please post an updated link? Thanks!
If the professors won’t debate on the merits of their “beliefs” then they are either unable to back up their claims or they are “captured pieces” being manipulated and maneuvered by big pharma.
Either way, their arguments are invalid because they lack any conviction and the ability to defend themselves.
They are nothing more than a figurehead, without substance.
On that note, for those that have paid attention - Snopes has been a BIG disappointment in investigating issues that have the slightest chance of being politically 'sensitive' ...
Thank you for your tireless efforts to expose the corrupt medical-industrial-government complex that used multiple billions of dollars to run a depopulation operation on humanity. The real net present value of the effort may be trillions with the sunk R&D costs of developing tbe mRNA scam, the lipid nanoparticles, and other nano tech in the mRNA bioweapons mislabeled vacines. The government used our money to pay universities, and others to develop deadly bioweapon technologies, paid Pfizer et. al. to manufacture them, and physicians to administer them all with a massive propaganda social control operation of Ed Bernay's socio-psychopathic deviancy. He being the grand nephew, if memory serves me right, of the deviant Sigmund Freud, another relative of whom is also a convicted pedophile. What a dark family.
Your work to expose the sleight of hand use of statistical data analysis to prop up deadly or dangerous vaccines is super impressive. It's clear you must have loved probability & stats. I took a good deal of it when I got my EE undergrad but your analysis demonstrates a deep knowledge of the field.
yeah. took a stats class in summer school while in high school. super valuable. Most kids never get exposed to it. Learned more in that class than at MIT.
That means you just have a talent for it as MIT EE is exceptional as it's where the genius, Claude Shannon, went then returned to after Bell Labs. Shannon's use of probability and statistics was profound. To show you what a cesspool of stupidity the Nobel Prize often is, Shannon, the founder of the information age, never won one. My father is the first Ph.D. in EE that University of Notre Dame graduated after it recruited Jim Masey, one of Shannon's top students, and other terrific EE's. Dad's still doing incredible research at age 87 in biomedical imaging working with a top neurosurgeon at Rush University Medical Center. Dad’s at UI Chicago. Dad developed imaging tech that Richard Penn, his Rush Colleague, wanted to commercialize, Dr. Penn having commercialized other of his own research, one company which he then sold to Medtronics. He knows IP commercialization in the medical field. I’m 62, retired and spent time in Big Pharma. It’s quite the racket. I’d love to have a 10 minute conversation with you some time.although I know you’re likely very busy. There’s a deep spiritual aspect to what’s happening globally that I’d like to discuss. And touch on some of the current politics. I interacted a great deal with Rich Daley, the Rahm when they ran Chicago, and was involved in Big Pharma PACS and much else in Chicago in the way of civic activism. Daley gave me the first STEM school in Chicago as part of a broad community plan I created to truly socioeconomically integrate on of the largest redevelopments of federal public housing in the nation as a moxed-income community. It's in the UI Chicago community. I interfaced with Rahm on it alot too. I hope to get a phone conversation with you some time if you're up for it. Either way, your work is amazing. You know more epidemiology than the experts.
I'm also planning on addressing Dr. Scott's and Professor Morris's BS "debunking" later this week when I get caught back up on normal life and get some time. But, I think your AI did a good job of describing the weaknesses of their mostly hand-waving arguments.
I plan to finally create my own Substack to have a place to publish my work on the Henry Ford Study etc. Probably will be called "The Feral Firefighter" (I've got an ancient blog by the same name in which I did a lot of work on the Pat Tillman story http://feralfirefighter.blogspot.com/ )
Thanks for this. Doing the lord’s work
So many decided to do the unconscionable - take the vax to keep their job. They were intimidated by the medical cabal, by their employer, and all the way up to the miserable president. Coercion led to compromise, and for many a compromise necessary to put food on the table.
Zervos did the same. Coerced and compromised. Now who do we trust - not Zervos. He caved.
The medical cabal's gaslighting and lies will continue until everyone says ... enough. 'An Inconvenient Study' is all the evidence needed to prove we need a new direction in our medical industry. Better yet, take control of your own health. MAHA.
Aaron Siri
Just watched the film...very well done. Those that refuse to even acknowledge there is a problem, let alone refuse to study the issue are the face of true evil. I think the strong-arm suppression of data like this is to protect a medical/insurance-industrial complex that would collapse if we suddenly stop producing chronically ill citizens. Extrapolate the numbers of chronic conditions seen in the unvaxxed cohort of studies like this to the entire population. What would happen. Pediatricians would be irrelevant (like they were prior to our out of control vaccination schedule). Doctors specializing in all of the chronic conditions that are caused by these vaccinations would barely be needed. Throw in real education on diet and health, with incentives to stay healthy and maybe the five trillion dollar health care industry collapses. I am not saying that there still won't be people with chronic illnesses but what if we can reduce the numbers by even 10% ? Wouldn't it be worth it?
Shocking that when you see a physician 7 times per year (vaccinated group) they're more likely to diagnose a disease than when you see a physician only 2 times per year (unvaccinated group). The vaccinated group was also watched for twice as long (follow up time of approx 2.7 years in vaccinated vs 1.3 years in unvaccinated). More time = more opportunity for diagnosis.
That's just one confounder, not even addressing poor methods, unrecognized confounders, statistic implausibilities, decreased power of the smaller sample size in unvaccinated, attrition bias, etc. It's very easy to feed this crap to laypeople who don't have enough background knowledge to see through all of that.
Steve, AlterAI is very helpful thank you for sharing. I was working on a Grok 4 analysis and unsurprisingly was feeling vexed by its underlying authority sources and assumptions assumed as fact. I crafted a list of questions based on the AlterAI output and entered it in my Grok 4 model. After which I asked Grok 4 "What actions would you suggest as being reasonable based on the Henry Ford Study?" Here is a link to the questions I posed and Groks answers along with Grok's response to the final question. https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_5c1f63bd-733f-468c-bf32-20e75c634ce1
Kirsch lies and misleads.
I never said I didn't see the Kaplan-Meier analysis -- I said I didn't see Jikky's response and then promptly responded to it.
You can see I have been talking about the fact that the Kaplan-Meier plot omitted number at risk on twitter dating back to September 12th (https://x.com/jsm2334/status/1966687747059663342)
You jumped and wrote all these false tweets implying I hadn't seen the Kaplan-Meier plot and then changed my story when you pointed it out, which are all demonstrable lies.
You can't counter my actual scientific points, so you have to lie and make s**t up to try to discredit me huh, Steve?
Every point I made in my critique of this study holds, and I have not changed them.
I appreciate Steve fixing his false claims I had not seen the Kaplan-Meier analysis or ignored it.
BTW, I have responded in detail to JikkyLeak's response to my critiques that Steve cites here (https://x.com/jsm2334/status/1978628414874501359).
TL/DR: “Kaplan-Meier plots are not immune to the major ascertainment bias problems evident in this study that are the focus of my critique”
There is something Zervos et al. did very good. Once they started finding the results they could have just tossed everything. BUT, they went all the way and created a finilized paper. Writting a paper like that, just writing, takes a lot of time. And they wraped it up.
Steve, when I clicked the link for the "Unbiased AI take: detailed take-down of all the arguments posed by Morris and Scott", I got a "404 shared chat not found" error. Can you please post an updated link? Thanks!
If the professors won’t debate on the merits of their “beliefs” then they are either unable to back up their claims or they are “captured pieces” being manipulated and maneuvered by big pharma.
Either way, their arguments are invalid because they lack any conviction and the ability to defend themselves.
They are nothing more than a figurehead, without substance.
"DEBOOONKED"
the swansong of institutional hacks everywhere
re: "DEBOOONKED"
On that note, for those that have paid attention - Snopes has been a BIG disappointment in investigating issues that have the slightest chance of being politically 'sensitive' ...
The study was done by a very reputable research organisation. You would assume they know how to do proper studies. It is definitely inconvenient.
Thank you for your tireless efforts to expose the corrupt medical-industrial-government complex that used multiple billions of dollars to run a depopulation operation on humanity. The real net present value of the effort may be trillions with the sunk R&D costs of developing tbe mRNA scam, the lipid nanoparticles, and other nano tech in the mRNA bioweapons mislabeled vacines. The government used our money to pay universities, and others to develop deadly bioweapon technologies, paid Pfizer et. al. to manufacture them, and physicians to administer them all with a massive propaganda social control operation of Ed Bernay's socio-psychopathic deviancy. He being the grand nephew, if memory serves me right, of the deviant Sigmund Freud, another relative of whom is also a convicted pedophile. What a dark family.
Your work to expose the sleight of hand use of statistical data analysis to prop up deadly or dangerous vaccines is super impressive. It's clear you must have loved probability & stats. I took a good deal of it when I got my EE undergrad but your analysis demonstrates a deep knowledge of the field.
yeah. took a stats class in summer school while in high school. super valuable. Most kids never get exposed to it. Learned more in that class than at MIT.
That means you just have a talent for it as MIT EE is exceptional as it's where the genius, Claude Shannon, went then returned to after Bell Labs. Shannon's use of probability and statistics was profound. To show you what a cesspool of stupidity the Nobel Prize often is, Shannon, the founder of the information age, never won one. My father is the first Ph.D. in EE that University of Notre Dame graduated after it recruited Jim Masey, one of Shannon's top students, and other terrific EE's. Dad's still doing incredible research at age 87 in biomedical imaging working with a top neurosurgeon at Rush University Medical Center. Dad’s at UI Chicago. Dad developed imaging tech that Richard Penn, his Rush Colleague, wanted to commercialize, Dr. Penn having commercialized other of his own research, one company which he then sold to Medtronics. He knows IP commercialization in the medical field. I’m 62, retired and spent time in Big Pharma. It’s quite the racket. I’d love to have a 10 minute conversation with you some time.although I know you’re likely very busy. There’s a deep spiritual aspect to what’s happening globally that I’d like to discuss. And touch on some of the current politics. I interacted a great deal with Rich Daley, the Rahm when they ran Chicago, and was involved in Big Pharma PACS and much else in Chicago in the way of civic activism. Daley gave me the first STEM school in Chicago as part of a broad community plan I created to truly socioeconomically integrate on of the largest redevelopments of federal public housing in the nation as a moxed-income community. It's in the UI Chicago community. I interfaced with Rahm on it alot too. I hope to get a phone conversation with you some time if you're up for it. Either way, your work is amazing. You know more epidemiology than the experts.
Just watched the whole thing. Excellent. Hoping a billion people watch it. Thanks Steve.
I'm also planning on addressing Dr. Scott's and Professor Morris's BS "debunking" later this week when I get caught back up on normal life and get some time. But, I think your AI did a good job of describing the weaknesses of their mostly hand-waving arguments.
I plan to finally create my own Substack to have a place to publish my work on the Henry Ford Study etc. Probably will be called "The Feral Firefighter" (I've got an ancient blog by the same name in which I did a lot of work on the Pat Tillman story http://feralfirefighter.blogspot.com/ )
Steve, thanks again for "pinning" my lengthy comments about the Henry Ford Study at the top of the Comment section of your previous post. https://kirschsubstack.com/p/my-email-to-henry-ford-media-relations/commen
Over the past month, I did a deep dive into the Henry Ford Study, and spent a lot of time last week writing my16-page "letter" to the Detroit Free Press reporter in the hopes of maybe influencing her coverage for the better (too late; take a look at the BS the HFH executives came up with in their interview with her! https://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2025/10/07/henry-ford-health-vaccine-study-informed-consent-action-network/86372042007/
Note: the article may now be behind a paywall; but I summarized much of the article in my comments).