Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cate Montana's avatar

I've been a professional journalist for 35 years, mostly writing in the field of alternative medicine. It was very clear to me early in 2020 that COVID was eminently treatable by a wide variety of protocols, and the doctors, NDs, homeopaths, TCM practitioners etc., I interviewed were happy to share their findings. Then the CDC released the document "Covid 19 Planning Scenarios, table 3, scenario 5: current best estimate, updated September 10, 2020" which stated the survivability rate for persons age 0 to 70 was 99.5%. I collected pertinent information on effective protocols, including some stunning clinical findings on the effectiveness of Ivermectin, and sent that and the CDC mortality estimates to 120 mainstream journalists at over 90 newspapers in the US. ONE REPORTER RESPONDED saying "I don't cover issues like this." Thinking there might be a ray of sunshine and a bit of curiosity left in the minds of young journalists in colleges and universities, I researched the names of editors at another 125 student newspapers and sent out the same information. ZERO RESPONSE. Journalism as we once knew it is dead as a doornail. Thank God for independent thinkers/researchers/bloggers/podcasters who have bravely picked up the reins and are doing the job bought-and-sold legacy media outlets have abandoned.

Expand full comment
SAMO's avatar

That is the same thing that happened when the 911 documentaries came out. I saw a video of a guy who was trying to GIVE THEM AWAY on the streets on NYC (I think it was) to journalists. NONE of them would take one. NOT ONE! I was shocked. They ALL declined. They cannot hear the truth, because then they would have to TELL the truth. Awful.

Expand full comment
166 more comments...

No posts