An open letter to the Austrian Parliament from retired Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Diether Schönitzer

A blood specialist weighs in on the proposed Austrian Covid 19 mandatory vaccination law planned for February 1, 2022. Sadly, nobody listens to scientists anymore so his voice will be ignored.

At-a-Glance

• Prof. Dr. med. Diether Shönitzer, a retired professor, previously at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, sent a letter to the Austrian Parliament expressing his opinion on Austria’s COVID-19 mandatory vaccination law. 

• In his letter, Dr. Shönitzer explains how the so-called mRNA vaccine leads to production of spike proteins on the surface of cells that line blood vessel walls and how these spike proteins are recognized as foreign bodies (antigens), leading to the production of antibodies and recruitment of activated killer cells, thereby resulting in tissue destruction in the vaccinated person.

• The professor stated that there is a high probability that the vaccinated will develop autoimmune reactions and that dormant infections, such as tuberculosis, will be reactivated, placing a dangerous strain on the health system.

• He argues against the introduction of mandatory vaccines with penalties against those who refuse to comply citing that such punishment is disproportionate.  He calls out his colleagues who are disregarding their Hippocratic oath by advising patients to take the vaccine or by vaccinating them

Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Diether Schönitzer, a blood specialist, weighs in on the proposed Austrian Covid 19 mandatory vaccination law planned for February 1, 2022.

Below, I’ve translated the original comment to make it easier to read.

Basically, he says the vaccines harm people and shouldn’t be mandated. He calls out experts who look the other way on these harms.

I reproduce it here just for the record. It shows that there are experts (who have no conflicts of interest) who are willing to speak out.

Retired experts are the most honest since there is much less fear of retribution.

Now, you’d think that there would be more retired experts in the US speaking out, but I guess few people want to wreck their retirement in this country.

Professor Schönitzer’s comment to the Austrian Parliament

Original here. Bold highlights are mine.

Opinion

Opinion on motion 2173 / A by MPs Gabriela Schwarz, Ralph Schallmeiner, colleagues on a federal law on mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 (COVID-19 mandatory vaccination law - COVID-19-IG)

Contents

Ladies and gentlemen,

I take the liberty of making a factual and technical opinion and an objection to the introduction of the Covid 19 mandatory vaccination law planned for February 1, 2022. I see my qualification for this objection justified as follows: I am retired Univ. Prof. of the University of Innsbruck and worked from 1968 to 2005 at the "Central Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunological Department" (a state primary clinic), initially as an assistant doctor, then as an Executive senior physician and finally worked on the board for 17 years.

The central topic of our daily work was the immunological assurance of the tolerance of the blood cells to be transfused, in particular the red blood cells and platelets, as well as the testing of tissue characteristics for organ and stem cell transplants. It was important to carefully select blood products according to blood groups and to take any antibodies against these cells into account. If necessary, patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemias also had to receive transfusions. The cause of these diseases is, among other things, the administration of various drugs that can give rise to a change in the surface of the blood cells. These changes result in neo-antigens that are recognized by the patient's immune system as foreign and lead to the death of these blood cells. The underlying degradation mechanisms are part of the basic immunological knowledge of doctors and can be confirmed in detail by laboratory tests.

This brings me straight to the administration of mRNA-containing substances that are incorrectly referred to as vaccines or serums and after penetrating the bloodstream first penetrate the vascular wall cells and subsequently lead to the formation of spike proteins on the surface of the vascular wall cells. These spikes actually act as foreign antigens (similar to drug-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia) and are supposed to lead to the formation of antibodies and thus to immunity. The problem, however, is that the spikes adhere to the body's own cells for at least a certain period of time, probably permanently, and the activated killer cells or antibodies (if the vaccination works!) Destroy the cells of the vaccinated person that are externally marked with spikes. The consequence is an immunological cell and tissue destruction in the vaccinated persons, which leads to the well-known thromboembolism, to the destruction of heart muscle cells, lung and kidney tissue, and ultimately to exhaustion of the immune system.

Booster vaccinations intensify these effects because fresh spikes that have arisen from the booster encounter antibodies that have now formed.

As a result, there is a high probability that acute and autoimmune reactions will arise as long-term consequences and dormant infections such as tuberculosis will be reactivated, which will endanger the health system more than is possible due to the proportion of healthy, vaccine-critical non-vaccinated people. In the latter, a relatively high natural immunization rate must be expected because weak and subclinical courses are not recorded.

The introduction of a mandatory vaccination with administrative penalties for non-vaccinating people, which can bring many people to their limits of existence, is not proportionate, so I expressly advise against the introduction of mandatory vaccination in general and in particular with the use of genetic material-containing ingredients. Punishments are a means of pressure that leads to psychological stress on our fellow human beings, so that compulsory vaccination de facto becomes compulsory (!).

It is frightening that colleagues including so-called experts who, out of immunological ignorance and / or disinterest, or under pressure, disregard the Hippocratic oath and advise their patients and their children to vaccinate or carry out the latter themselves!

Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Diether Schönitzer