To persons I don't tell that Socrates is rolling in his grave, instead I argue that Adam Smith, J.H. Keynes, and Marx are rolling in their graves, because what's going on is that the macro rich have got richer and the rest poorer. 1% of the richest on the World have gone from owing 45% of all on the Earth excisting to 55%, around 20% in …
To persons I don't tell that Socrates is rolling in his grave, instead I argue that Adam Smith, J.H. Keynes, and Marx are rolling in their graves, because what's going on is that the macro rich have got richer and the rest poorer. 1% of the richest on the World have gone from owing 45% of all on the Earth excisting to 55%, around 20% in a year. But if we looked at only 1%% of the riches, opposit to the rest 999%% , then the difference would be bigger. And this is not what Smiths thalked about in "The Wealth of Nations", or Keynes warning after the first World War.
To persons I don't tell that Socrates is rolling in his grave, instead I argue that Adam Smith, J.H. Keynes, and Marx are rolling in their graves, because what's going on is that the macro rich have got richer and the rest poorer. 1% of the richest on the World have gone from owing 45% of all on the Earth excisting to 55%, around 20% in a year. But if we looked at only 1%% of the riches, opposit to the rest 999%% , then the difference would be bigger. And this is not what Smiths thalked about in "The Wealth of Nations", or Keynes warning after the first World War.