Could you please elaborate on the comment related to suppressing treating vaccine injuries? How is this more of a priority to suppress vs. discussion on adverse vaccine reactions initially caused by the jab?
Could you please elaborate on the comment related to suppressing treating vaccine injuries? How is this more of a priority to suppress vs. discussion on adverse vaccine reactions initially caused by the jab?
Basically I noticed the AFL and pierre kory started mentioning they were treating vaccine injuries by tetehealth, and a few days later the american board of internal medicine started going after these doctors after not doing anything throughout the pandemic. There are a lot of reasons why they would have wanted to silence that discussion.
Could you please elaborate on the comment related to suppressing treating vaccine injuries? How is this more of a priority to suppress vs. discussion on adverse vaccine reactions initially caused by the jab?
They control the narrative on initial reactions. They don’t control the long term health problems arising narrative.
Basically I noticed the AFL and pierre kory started mentioning they were treating vaccine injuries by tetehealth, and a few days later the american board of internal medicine started going after these doctors after not doing anything throughout the pandemic. There are a lot of reasons why they would have wanted to silence that discussion.