That book recycles moldy old antivax tropes revived for the pandemic.
Recommended instead: Vaccines and Your Child: Separating Fact from Fiction — co-authored by Charlotte A. Moser , and Vaccines: What Everyone Needs To Know by Kristen Feemster. The authors rely on evidence and don't hide behind "Anonymous", like your turtle friend.
That book recycles moldy old antivax tropes revived for the pandemic.
Recommended instead: Vaccines and Your Child: Separating Fact from Fiction — co-authored by Charlotte A. Moser , and Vaccines: What Everyone Needs To Know by Kristen Feemster. The authors rely on evidence and don't hide behind "Anonymous", like your turtle friend.
Instead of pulling into one's shell so that facts bounce off, try reading those books. Don't be duped by tech multi-multi millionaires who deal in ludicrous conspiracy theories while milking "thousands of _paid_ subscribers".
"As the editors and past editors of ALL the medical journals have said"
Actually, it was just _one_ past editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, Marcia Angell, who advised us to distrust clinical research. And her credibility has taken a hit.
Beyond your attempts to change the subject - any thoughts on why we're supposed to trust "96 doctors" (many of whom aren't even physicians) who are antivaccine, rather than the millions of physicians who recognize the value of vaccines and get them for themselves and their children?
That book recycles moldy old antivax tropes revived for the pandemic.
Recommended instead: Vaccines and Your Child: Separating Fact from Fiction — co-authored by Charlotte A. Moser , and Vaccines: What Everyone Needs To Know by Kristen Feemster. The authors rely on evidence and don't hide behind "Anonymous", like your turtle friend.
Instead of pulling into one's shell so that facts bounce off, try reading those books. Don't be duped by tech multi-multi millionaires who deal in ludicrous conspiracy theories while milking "thousands of _paid_ subscribers".
"As the editors and past editors of ALL the medical journals have said"
Actually, it was just _one_ past editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, Marcia Angell, who advised us to distrust clinical research. And her credibility has taken a hit.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2012/12/14/marcia-angells-attacks-on-pharma-have-lost-all-credibility/?sh=540d26602737
Beyond your attempts to change the subject - any thoughts on why we're supposed to trust "96 doctors" (many of whom aren't even physicians) who are antivaccine, rather than the millions of physicians who recognize the value of vaccines and get them for themselves and their children?