Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nuance Wire's avatar

I would say the FDA lied "with" Pfizer instead of Pfizer lied to the FDA.

The key wording in the application is "proposed" and many of us were screaming our heads off back in 2020 that Big Pharma wasn't (officially) claiming that their "vaccines" prevented infection in the first place.

They were only (officially) claiming (dubiously at best) that the "vaccines" reduced symptoms - if that.

FDA was more than happy to allow this bait and switch on the application however because it would have been a bridge too far to approve an EUA for a "vaccine" that wasn't even at least presumed to be a "vaccine" as defined still using the commonly understood definition of "vaccine" at that time.

In other words it needed to at least have a stated goal of preventing transmission / infection because that's what a "vaccine" does.

Or did.

For those that don't recall how all of this actually went down, try using Google and doing a search with a timeframe of Jan 2020 - Jan 2021, and searching for terms like "Pfizer + Vaccine + reduce symptoms", and one can take a quick trip down memory lane to see how all of this actually progressed over time.

It was the media and reckless politicians making the outright claims that the "vaccines" prevented transmission but as I recall it was never Pfizer themselves outside their stated "goal" on their application. A "goal" doesn't really matter because they can't be held to that. I hope that makes sense.

In fact they never had any data (as is being finally being absorbed by many now) to support the notion that the "vaccine" prevented spread or transmission at all.

Instead they simply used all kinds of marketing bait and switch tactics, their bought and paid for media and political hacks, and a bunch of bureaucrats (e.g. Fauci) to float it out there that it prevented spread to dupe uninformed scared people into taking the poison.

Their lawyers would have never allowed them to make "official" claims outside what they could prove with their data, which wasn't much to begin with.

In fact it seems like it was pretty much all bad which is why they preferred to hide it for 75 years.

Expand full comment
Jose L. Trasancos's avatar

Steve, I am well-versed in data analysis and very familiar with SAS data structures and programming. I am willing and able to assist in this examination process. Please contact me at jose@cogforlife.org. Sincerely, Jose L. Trasancos, Ph.D.

Expand full comment
101 more comments...

No posts